Diary 53

Stand-Alone
Sound Digitizing Device

Lansing, Michigan


September 27, 2002. We left Dallas for Okemos, Michigan. Dr. Stuart Gage and our small team are quite happy with the overall performance of the pilot Sound Digitizing Device (SDD). So far the system is very stable; no known outages, the quality of the sound is very good, and it is connected wirelessly with spread spectrum radios, providing MP3 audio streams to an MSU Internet site http://cevl.msu.edu as the "NSF prototype machine".

The next logical step would change the power system of the SDD to a completely stand-alone system, independent of utility power. As installed, the system ran on standard 110V AC supplied from an outlet on the Gage's home. Utility power is usually not feasible for true remote deployments, but tackling the independent power task during the last trip was not viable at the time. We did not have enough proof of concept experience to warrant the expense of the solar powered system, and there were some minor adjustments to make to the system to improve its operation in the way of file naming conventions and ability to access the system from a remote location.

During the initial installation phase, we worked around the network limitations of the existing network at the Gage home where our pilot system would be proven. This trip would focus on providing better communications with the SDD for remote administration and updates, provide another option for streaming and restore the network operation to the same virtual operation that existed before we first installed the SDD.

To enable the system to be powered from the sun, we took steps to decrease the power consumption by removing the video card requirement from the Linux boot sequence. We acquired two large 100Watt solar panels and two 90Amp hour batteries to get the system through the long, dreary Michigan days that are fast approaching in fall and winter.

The solar panels and batteries are from West Marine http://www.westmarine.com. The solar panels are supplied with 7Amp rated charge regulators. The panels can produce 6.7Amps each, so the entire power system is placed in parallel. The panels are connected to the charge regulators independently, and each is connected to its respective battery. Finally each like-polarity battery terminal is tied together - positive connected to positive and negative connected to negative, so the batteries are in parallel.

 

Solar Panels and batteries staged for installation. The SDD system is still in its temporary mounting location.
Guard dog "Cowboy" supervises the installation.


Batteries are capable of truly incredible amperage, so protection of all wiring is very highly recommended. If there is a fault, such as a short in a device powered by the batteries, a fuse rated at or below the maximum current rating of the wire, in series with the device (load) and the battery will protect the system from damage. In the case of a fault, the fuse will open, preventing current flow. In most cases, it is highly desirable to locate the fuses in a location easy to reach, and near the point of power origination, such as at the battery terminals if possible.

Mike making battery connections. The charge regulators are not plugged
in at the solar panel end for safety during this point of the installation

In this installation, the charge regulators are acting as circuit breakers between the solar panels and the batteries per the manufacturers' instructions, no fuse required here, but highly recommended if the charge regulators were not designed to open the circuit during a fault condition. Additional fuses are placed in other locations to protect the wiring. One fuse is between the positive poles of the two batteries to prevent a fault in case one battery has a severe internal problem. This link will open reducing potential destruction of the wiring between the two batteries. A second fuse is placed between the batteries and the load. If there is a major fault on the load, the current drawn from the batteries will not exceed the current capacity of the wire. A third fuse is placed between the main fused link and the SDD computer platform. This was left over from the previous installation, but it is not a bad idea to protect the DC-DC converter of the SDD system. In case the DC-DC converter has a fault, it will not self destruct to the point it would if it were on the main fuse. The fuse should be smaller and open before major damage is done.

See figure 1 below:

 


The illustration above is a standard way of installing a power system. The source (solar panel) is protected from a battery fault by the charge controllers. The batteries are protected from one another by the fuse between the (+) positive terminals of each battery. The batteries (in this case a source for the load) is protected by a fuse on the positive lead of the load. Also shown is an additional fuse inside the load providing protection specifically for the SDD, this could be repeated for each load, such as the Pre-amp and the radio.

The solar panels are rated at 100 Watts each in direct sunlight. Wattage is calculated as P=E*I, where P=Power, E=Voltage and I=Current. If E provides a charging voltage of approximately 14.4V, then I= P/E, (100/14.4) or 6.9 Amps. Since we have 2 solar panels, we might see 2 x 6.9, or 13.8 Amps charge current at peak sunlight. Efficiencies result in a slightly lower charge current, so plan on a few percentage points less.

Since Michigan is cloudy many days of the year (I grew up in Michigan, I know it is cloudy quite a bit) and knowing the solar opportunities are limited, this solar powering system needs to be far more robust than a system installed in a sunny region such as in Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, etc., where the sky clear most of the time. However, some reduced amount of charge current is still generated by the solar panels even in cloudy conditions. In our case, our load draws only 1.2 Amps, including the SDD, Pre-amp for the microphone and the spread spectrum radio. This is a fairly efficient system! 1.2 Amps should be generated on the most dreary days, short of a solar eclipse.

If we do not have charge controllers or solar panels with reverse blocking diodes, our next worry is night drain. At night, solar panels without built-in blocking diodes turn into resistors or effectively a load connected to the batteries, draining the batteries in parallel with the intended load (the SDD). To prevent night drain, blocking diodes are usually added to the system between the solar panels and batteries. The anode of the diode is connected to the solar panel positive lead, the cathode to the battery positive lead. The negative lead of the solar panel is connected to the battery directly. The diode must be rated a bit higher than the maximum solar panel output, such as 10 Amps for a 7 Amp panel.

In our case, we don't have to worry about night drain from the solar panels. Our solar panels have blocking diodes built in. Look for this feature when buying larger panels. We do have the constant drain of the load day and night however, consisting of the SDD, Pre-amp and Spread Spectrum radio, a 1.2 Amp constant drain, a drain of 1.2 Amp-hours (1.2 Amps per hour.)

In Lansing, Michigan, we are just a few degrees south of the 45th parallel, so it gets dark fairly early in the evening and light late in the morning during winter. We may also have a problem with snow on the panels. So we must plan on a fair storage capacity during these periods of no charge. The batteries are rated at 90 Amp-hours each. When connected in parallel, the battery bank yields about 180 Amp hours of capacity. The load draws 1.2 Amps, so in one hour with no solar power, our battery storage will be depleted to 178.8 Amp hours reserve. In 150 hours or 6.25 days, our batteries would be dead. A good number for "dead" should not be zero volts, but rather 0.9 volts per cell as a minimum voltage, or 10.8 volts across a 12 Volt battery. Discharging a battery beyond this level can result in internal cell polarity reversal, a mode fairly terminal to battery life (no pun intended).

Low light levels require large panels To get us through the dark Michigan winter.

After a 14 hour night of load drain with the SDD, we will have consumed 16.8 Amp hours of current. This would take roughly 1.28 hours of direct sunlight to replace. However, we are still draining while charging, the load did not go away! The effective charging power is not 13.8 Amps, but 13.8 minus the load of 1.2 Amps, or 12.6 Amps.

13.8(Charge rate) - 1.2(Load Rate) = 12.6(Effective Charge Rate)

16.8 AH consumed / 12.6 Amps (Effective Charge) = 1.3 hours

This assumes we have enough power from the solar panels to break even at minimum for the daylight hours. Tests at the Gage home, severely shadowing the solar panels with our body shadows indicated we should have more power than break even unless it is very, very cloudy.

Solar energy available along with the efficiencies involved in charging result in charge times longer than the 1.3 hours reflected above. For this, a fudge factor could be used to provide a little margin, or

12.6 Amps (Effective Charge) x 85% = 10.71 Amps for a new Effective Charge rate.

16.8 AH consumed / 10.71 Amps (Effective Charge) = 1.56 hours direct sunlight required

A safety note about batteries:

1) Batteries give off Hydrogen as a bi-product of the charging process. If a spark ignites the hydrogen, you could experience a hydrogen explosion causing serious injury, even death. Although the battery design itself makes an attempt to minimize the risk of an explosion, it can still happen with almost every type of battery, since water (H2O) is usually a major component of the electrolyte, and the charging process (electrolysis) frees a small portion of the hydrogen and oxygen atoms from the water molecule (electrolyte) into the two separate elements.

a. Minimize your danger risk by reducing the chance of hydrogen production. Do not work on batteries while they are charging or discharging. If a battery is sitting idle with no load or charge current, the hydrogen production will be minimized.

b. Wear safety gear. Eye protection is a must.

c. Do not enclose your batteries in a sealed container. This tends to trap the gasses and can contribute to an explosion. Batteries should always be in a well-ventilated area.
d. Use sealed Gel-cell batteries whenever possible. The hydrogen created by sealed cells is minimal, and greatly reduces the chance of an explosion.

e. Never use tools that are longer than the distance between the poles of a battery without being properly insulated. Insulate longer tools with tape or shrink tubing. If by chance the tools fall across the battery poles, the chance of a short is minimized.

f. Use fuses generously. Fuses are cheap insurance against mishaps and failures.

 


Left to Right: Michael Willett, Stuart Gage, David Hughes Jr.

Michael Willett
Senior Technical Assistant and Collaborator

 

PREVIOUS

NEXT

For Further Reading:

The networking portion of the prototype Sound Digitizing Device installation is explained in